Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Carrillo et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2021cv01082
Plaintiff:
Jorge M Carrillo and Celia Carrillo
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Med Care Emergency Medical Services, Inc. v. City of Pharr, Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
MED CARE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
City of Pharr, Texas, Itza Flores, Ambrosio "Amos" Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Flow-Zone, LLC v. Carrillo et al
as 4:2021cv03499
Plaintiff:
Flow-Zone, LLC
Defendant:
Felipe Carrillo and Randall G. Myers
Urias v. Friend
as 5:2021cv00220
Petitioner:
Valente Carrillo Urias
Respondent:
Martin Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez et al v. City of Port Isabel et al
as 1:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Axel Gutierrez, Rocio Gutierrez and Maria Carrillo
Defendant:
City of Port Isabel, Port Isabel Police Department, Robert Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo et al v. Benson
as 5:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Carrillo, Nancy Carrillo and Eva Carrillo
Defendant:
Stewart Allan Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danny Herman Trucking, Inc. v. Miranda et al
as 4:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Liliana Miranda and Catalina Villegas de Carrillo
Plaintiff:
Danny Herman Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmiston et al v. Culberson County, Texas et al
as 3:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Helen Holman and Shanon Edmiston
Defendant:
Oscar Borrego, Sr., Adelaida Zambra, Ernesto Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo v. Dinkins et al
as 4:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Lorena Carrillo
Defendant:
Lt. NFN Butler, Ms. NFN Wynn, Ms. NFN Dinkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Paxton, Jr.
as 1:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
John Ruffier, Jennifer Ramos, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and others
Defendant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
