Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Thomson v. Zoelle et al
as 3:2021cv03022
Petitioner:
Eric James Thomson
Defendant:
Dr. Jeffrey Zoelle and Don Harris, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bennett et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
James Bennett, The City of Bettendorf and Bettendorf Community School District
Plaintiff:
S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Strobl v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00382
Defendant:
Marlon Harris and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward Strobl, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wadley et al v. University of Iowa et al
as 4:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Akrum Wadley, Kevonte Martin-Manley, Andre Harris and others
Defendant:
Gary Barta, Board of Regents of The State of Iowa, Christopher Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Duke University Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
President OBama, Angela Byers, United Nations Members and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv01046
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Scott Michael Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris-Bentley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv02060
Plaintiff:
Juilien Harris-Bentley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. NAPCO, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
NAPCO, Inc. and Norris Asphalt Paving Co., LC
Plaintiff:
Sean D. Harris
Harris-Thompson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00009
Interested Party:
Jay Elliott Denne, Johnathan B Hammond and Harold Garfinkel
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris-Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jaye v. USA, et al--PER #3 ORDER PLAINTIFF AUTHORIZED TO EMAIL HIS PLEADINGS
as 1:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Mary Melfi, William Barr, Robert E Kirschman and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
