Cases 21 - 30 of 1,221
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Eldridge v. Boggs et al
as 0:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Mark Eldridge
Defendant:
Johnny W. Boggs, Elliott County Fiscal Court, Casey Brammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Swedish Match Leaf Tobacco Co. et al
as 4:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Paul Johnson
Defendant:
Swedish Match Leaf Tobacco Co., Atalian Global Services and Paige Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Simpson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Brad Simpson
Defendant:
Angela Johnson, Shelley Santry, Claudette Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Johnson
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Abigial Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Kimbro et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Kimbro, Ofc Piszner, Captain Mike Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Andreana F. Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
