Cases 21 - 30 of 132
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
ELDER NEHEMIAS LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JHAIR GENEROSO PATERNINA-CHRISTOPHER and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CNH Industrial Capital America, LLC v. Goza Farms, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
CNH Industrial Capital America, LLC
Defendant:
Goza Farms, LLC and Milton M. Goza, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poche v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Milton Gerard Poche
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Trotter v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Milton Trotter
Defendant:
Pelecia E. Hall and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rudolph v. City of Moss Point, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Nellie Rudolph
Defendant:
City of Moss Point, Mississippi, Marquese Davis, Milton Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Milton et al
as 4:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dixon
Defendant:
Bennie Milton, James Haywood, Eddie Bounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holton v. Washington et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Johnny Milton Holton
Defendant:
O. D. Washington, MTC, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Ladner et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Denzel Milton Collins
Defendant:
Wade Ladner and Hancock County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Ladner et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Denzel Milton Collins
Defendant:
Wade Ladner and Hancock County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
