Cases 21 - 30 of 3,991
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTSON v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LASHEA ROBERTSON and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Rescue Mission et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
Rescue Mission and Room In The Inn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nanney v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02286
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Nanney, II
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
