Cases 21 - 30 of 31
IMDB.com Inc v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 18-15469
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IMDB.COM INC, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Intervenor-Defendant:
SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS
Institute for Free Speech v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-17403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, FKA Center for Competitive Politics
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Institute for Free Speech v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-17403
Amicus Curiae:
THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE, FREE SPEECH COALITION and FREE SPEECH DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, FKA Center for Competitive Politics
Larry Flynt, et al v. Wayne Quint, et al
as 17-17318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. FLYNT, HAIG KELEGIAN, Sr. and HAIG T. KELEGIAN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE J. QUINT, in his official capacity as the Chief of the California Department of Justice, BUREAU OF GAMBLING CONTROL, JIM EVANS, in his official capacity as member of the California Gambling Control Commission and others
State of California, ex rel. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California v. Sessions et al
as 3:2017cv04701
Plaintiff:
State of California, ex rel. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Alan R Hanson and United States Department Of Justice, Atrorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-56081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DUNCAN, RICHARD LEWIS, PATRICK LOVETTE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-56081
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, GAYS AGAINST GUNS, PRIDE FUND TO END GUN VIOLENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WADDELL, VIRGINIA DUNCAN, DAVID MARGUGLIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC.
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Barry Bauer, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 15-15428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY BAUER, NICOLE FERRY, JEFFREY HACKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, STEPHEN LINDLEY, in his official capacity as Acting Chief of the California Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
