Cases 21 - 30 of 271
Pascoe v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Defendant:
William Shane Richardson, Thomas Young, Joey Board and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pascoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. SSA
as 5:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Myron v. USA et al
as 5:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Allan Young Myron and Myron Allan Young
Respondent:
USA and David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. USA
as 5:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
Clark D. Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Young v. SSA
as 5:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Deanna Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Schroll v. Wilson et al
as 6:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Shelly Schroll
Defendant:
Allen W. Wilson, Joseph G. Braden, Keith W. Young, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bozeman v. Walker Mechanical Maintanace et al
as 3:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
Walker Mechanical Maintanace and T. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bewley et al
as 3:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jessica Bewley, Guardian of J.B., Guardian of H.B. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bozeman v. Salmons et al
as 3:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
C/O Salmons, C/O Lutz, C/O Douglous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilkerton v. Chaney et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Keith Alan Pilkerton
Defendant:
Sergeant B. Chaney, Officer A. Thomas, Officer Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
