Cases 21 - 30 of 455
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Young v. Green
as 2:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Young
Defendant:
Myles Green and United Parcel Service
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Scott Young
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayfield v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Rayfield
Defendant:
Sgt Young, Officer Fink and Officer Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
