Cases 21 - 30 of 146
Everett v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
Dwan Everett
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Detective R. Hopps, Star No. 21218 and R. Hopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Everett v. Cannady
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Everett
Defendant:
Hon. T. Cannady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tammons v. St. Clair County Jail
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Cathy MacElroy, Janelle Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prindable v. Everett et al
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Luke A. Prindable
Defendant:
C/O Everett, C/O Briggs, Richard Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chambers et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Headrick
Defendant:
Sgt. Chambers, C/O Brown, C/O Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00116
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Everett Hensley
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Everett et al
as 3:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Joshua W. Everett, Marie R. Elliott and Illinois Housing Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Everett v. Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv03478
Respondent:
David Gomez
Petitioner:
Christopher Deshawn Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holland v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv03307
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
Everette Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
