Cases 21 - 30 of 513
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice
Amicus Curiae:
Esq Lizelle Martin
Richey v. Spielman et al
as 3:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Michael F Richey and Michael F. Richey
Defendant:
Lori Spielman, Brian Santana and Brian Santa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC et al v. Gifford et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC and Evgjieni Baca
Defendant:
Dierdre Gifford and John F. McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. f/k/a Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. v. KKJS Enterprises LLC d/b/a Mill Pond Country Store
as 3:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. f/k/a Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
KKJS Enterprises LLC d/b/a Mill Pond Country Store
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rashid v. Kurtulus et al
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Kalican Kurtulus, Jerome F French, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
F&H Architectural Design and Consulting, LLC et al v. Caffereli et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
F&H Architectural Design and Consulting, LLC and Steven A. Kalur
Defendant:
Bryan T. Caffereli, Philip H. Cerrone, Angela D Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
