Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Wedgeworth v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
William Stephens, Edgar D Baker, Jr, Lisa Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Kiel et al
as 4:2015cv02307
Petitioner:
Antonio Dudley
Respondent:
Amy Kiel, Jessica Kunre and Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Kuhre et al
as 4:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Defendant:
Jessica Kuhre, Amy Kiel and Joel Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Maxwell Edwards
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Roman Chavez, Juanita Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
as 1:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brukendra Jackson and T'Liza Kiel
Defendant:
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Sula v. Thaler et al
as 1:2013cv00617
Defendant:
Conrith Davis, James Hensarling, James P. Kiel, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Sula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Kiel et al
as 1:2013cv00493
Plaintiff:
Zakee Zaleem Abdullah
Defendant:
Bowie County, Texas, James Hensarling, James Paul Kiel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohler v. Macklin et al
as 1:2012cv00712
Defendant:
Corinth L. Davis, Earl El-Amin, Pamela D. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Arthur Kohler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Owens et al
as 1:2012cv00313
Defendant:
Corinth Davis, Thomas G. Fordyce, Pamela D. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeary v. Owens et al
as 1:2011cv00768
Defendant:
Conrinth Davis, Earl El-Amin, Pamela D. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Buddy Jene Yeary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
