Cases 21 - 30 of 26,302
CAVALIERE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON CAVALIERE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
KAREN K VALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEIS ACQUISITION AUXGA, LLC v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
NEIS ACQUISITION AUXGA, LLC
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WHITEHEAD v. T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN MARIE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC and CHRISTIAN EPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YOUNG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ANNA MARIE YOUNG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
