Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 21 - 30 of 122,576
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Titus-Lay v. California Northstate University, LLC
as 2:2024cv01231
Plaintiff: Erika Titus-Lay
Defendant: California Northstate University, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(HC) Wilhelm v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 2:2024cv01226
Petitioner: Steve Wilhelm
Respondent: Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff: Anthony E. Mack
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Defendant: Gomez and Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff: Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant: A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Castro et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Defendant: J. Castro and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?