Cases 31 - 40 of 22,128
Paschel v. Martin et al
as 4:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paschel
Defendant:
Sheriff Leroy Martin, Jail Administrator Gean Sieger and Chief Deputy Jerry Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Antonio Lamont Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarez-Real v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Victor Hugo Alvarez-Real
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Tom Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanigan v. Musselwhite et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Terry Swanigan
Defendant:
Musselwhite, Fitzpatrick, Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Wells et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
C Wells and C Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornsberry v. Granville et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Thornsberry
Defendant:
Carrie Granville, Arkansas Department of Correction, Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Rodric D Cohns
Defendant:
Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
