Cases 31 - 40 of 603
Wilansky v. Bakke et al
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sophia Wilansky
Defendant:
Paul D. Bakke, Thomas M. Grosz, Matthew J. Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Emrit v. Jules
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ree v. Belcourt School District et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Emerson Joe Ree
Defendant:
Belcourt School District, Michelle Thomas, Melvin Laducer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Blanchard v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Blanchard and Stanley Keith Blanchard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Smith v. Neo et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Theresa Neo and St. Louis, County of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mehu v. WDAY et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Marlon Mozart Mehu
Defendant:
WDAY doing business as Forum Communications Company, Jeff Nelson, Drew Trafton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Banerjee v. Brady et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joyanta Banerjee
Defendant:
Reid A. Brady, East Central Judicial District and North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
