Cases 31 - 40 of 2,016
Jones, Michael v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Defendant:
Leo Hammer, Mike Olsen, Kevin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Jones
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcghee, Ladarius v. Pratter, Jesse et al
as 3:2024cv00612
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3, Sgt. Timothy Rutledge, C.O. Jesse Pratter and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Deequanmay Mcghee
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Doe(s), Jane/John et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe(s) and Beloit Police Department
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bertsinger v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv01074
Defendant:
Capt Arndt, Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Leland Michael Bertsinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv01070
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Coleman, Timothy v. Jerzewski, Joseph et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and Joseph Jerzewski
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2024cv01048
Defendant:
Sgt Santiago, Milwaukee Police Department, City of Milwaukee and others
Plaintiff:
Trevonn D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown, Lester v. Doe 1-5, John
as 3:2024cv00549
Defendant:
John Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Lester Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
