Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Hill v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv03101
Petitioner:
Jason Robert Hill
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hill
as 0:2022cv02927
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. USA
as 0:2022cv02853
Petitioner:
James Flaherty Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hill v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02614
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Hill
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Washington v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections' Supervisor Officials et al
as 0:2022cv02277
Plaintiff:
Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept. of Corrections' Supervisor Officials, MCF-OPH, MCF-STW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oak Hills Fellowship, Inc. v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv02095
Plaintiff:
Oak Hills Fellowship, Inc.
Defendant:
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Mayfield v. Motel 6 Hotel et al
as 0:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Tara Mayfield
Defendant:
Motel 6 Hotel, Michael Hill, Jr, Stephanie Antwine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mayfield v. Super 8 Hotel et al
as 0:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Tara Mayfield
Defendant:
Super 8 Hotel, Michael Hill, Jr, Stephanie Antwine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mayfield v. Hill et al
as 0:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Tara Mayfield
Defendant:
Michael Hill, Jr, Best Western Normandy, Stephanie Antwine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
