Cases 31 - 40 of 189
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON v. ROCKWELL TACTICAL GROUP, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01244
Defendant:
SEAN MCMAHON, JOSHUA PRINCE, TIFFANY MCMAHON and others
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATTERBURY v. EARN COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CASEY OLIVERA, NAKIA RATTRAY, DONNELL MORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ATTERBURY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
TISDALE v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2021cv00745
Defendant:
KEVIN J. RANSOM, G. DOMINIC WELLPATH, ZACHARY MOSLAK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TISDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, Wellpath, Jorge Dominic and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00293
Defendant:
KEVIN RANSOM, WELLPATH, JORGE DOMINIC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION et al
as 2:2020cv05948
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, COUNTY ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 2:2020cv05949
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL AND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY AND PRINCE GEORGES COUNTIES and STATES ATTORNEYS
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUFF v. BHATI, et al
as 2:2020cv05830
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUFF
Defendant:
PRINCE BHATI and TL TRANSPORTATION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Ransom et al
as 1:2020cv01826
Defendant:
Lea Martin, Dr. Scott Prince and Kevin Ransom
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Ransom et al
as 3:2020cv01826
Defendant:
Lea Martin, Dr. Scott Prince and Kevin Ransom
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
