Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Santos v. Jefferson Davis Tech. College et al
as 1:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Jefferson Davis Tech. College, Mr. Thame and Robin Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin et al v. Muscletech Research and Development Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02361
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Rankin , Erwin Santos and Andrew Heil
Defendant:
Muscletech Research and Development Inc, Iovate Health Sciences USA Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Research Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2010cv02057
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. State of Alabama, The
as 2:2010cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos et al v. Rebel Amusement Rides, Inc.
as 2:2010mc00636
Plaintiff:
Ashley Santos
Defendant:
Rebel Amusement Rides, Inc.
Petitioner:
Addiction & Mental Health Services, Inc
Santos v. Hetrick et al
as 1:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
R, Hetrick and C. Savol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Flowers et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv01087
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
D. Flowers, G. Brown, B. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adalberto-Malara et al v. George Drywall, Inc.,
as 2:2009cv01933
Plaintiff:
Ismael Adalberto-Malara, Ismael Adalberto-Malara, Santiago Landaverde and others
Defendant:
George Drywall, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Santos v. Flemmings et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Danny Flemmings, J. C. Giles and M. Larry Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lohman (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez L. Santos
Defendant:
Mark Lohman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
