Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Seidel v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Agnes Bridgett Seidel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones-Waters v. Continental Service Group, Inc. d/b/a/ ConServe
as 6:2017cv06389
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Jones-Waters
Defendant:
Continental Service Group, Inc. d/b/a/ ConServe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones-Waters v. Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA
as 6:2017cv06390
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Jones-Waters
Defendant:
Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams et al v. The City Of New York ,
as 1:2016cv03445
Plaintiff:
Violeta Hernandez, Jerome Adams, Mechelle Agard and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Rathgeber et al
as 2:2016cv02399
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Allen
Defendant:
James J. Caller, Bridgett Dormer, Joseph N Lomangino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv02342
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Lane
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Oy and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adesanya, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2016cv00925
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gloria Adesanya , Khadija Ahmad , Kaii Almeida-Falcones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv09350
Plaintiff:
Bridgette L. Burch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiffs #1-21 v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2015cv02431
Defendant:
Supervisory John Doe Defendants, John Doe Defendants, Officer Bridgett Dormer and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs #1-21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv02983
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
