Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Stubbs v. Jordan et al
as 1:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Cornell Stubbs
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan and Joseph Cooley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, Judge F. Keith Ball, Clerk Arthur Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Winston et al
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Officer Riel, Officer Chapman, Officer Jordan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jimmiemac Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00358
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Brooks
as 1:2021cv00032
Respondent:
Trina Davidson Brooks
Petitioner:
Charles Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Jerett Jordan
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, John Doe and Ron King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Copeland v. (Current) Superintendant of Parchman, et al
as 4:2020cv00162
Defendant:
(Current) Superintendant of Parchman, Missi, Missi. Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan M. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Woodland et al
as 1:2020cv00275
Defendant:
Unknown Kumar, Unknown Jordan, Unknown Woodland and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dalton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sanders et al
as 5:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Travis Patten, Lillie Blackmon Sanders, Walter Armstrong and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
