Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Stevenson, Kerry v. Hoffman, Karl
as 3:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Stevenson
Defendant:
Karl M. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Key, Prince v. Mashak, Meredith et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Prince Key
Defendant:
Meredith Mashak , Keisha Perrenoud , Salam Syed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerry, Inc. v. Sabater Spices North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00858
Plaintiff:
Kerry, Inc.
Defendant:
Sabater Spices North America, Inc. and Ramon Sabater S.A.U.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linder v. Hawley et al
as 2:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kevin Linder
Defendant:
Kerry Hawley , Sue Frkovich, Neil Thoreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Griffin v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2015cv00140
Petitioner:
Gabriel Griffin
Respondent:
Kerri McKenzie and Mr Haffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zietlow, Marijo et al v. Taste of New Orleans, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Marijo Zietlow , Michael Young and Kerry Gillespie
Defendant:
Taste of New Orleans, Inc., Alabama's Dixieland Bar-B Q, Inc. and Sam S. Rotolo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Moore v. Clarke et al
as 2:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
Lamondre Moore
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr , Major Burnmiester, Mr Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins, Robert v. Lew, Jacob et al
as 3:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Perkins
Defendant:
Jacob J. Lew , John Koskinen, Debra K. Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
