Cases 31 - 40 of 472
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PANTOJA et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2022cv02512
Plaintiff:
SITO PANTOJA and WILLIAM RODY
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ, DORA CERVANTES, GARY R. ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
LORANCE v. ARMY
as 1:2022cv02500
Plaintiff:
Clint Allen Lorance and CLINT A. LORANCE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv02063
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
