Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Crowe v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Clayton Crowe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cox v. Crowe
as 5:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Christopher Cox
Defendant:
James Crowe, Ernest Farmer, Woody Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Antonelli v. Crow et al
as 6:2008cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael C. Antonelli
Respondent:
Brad Crow, Jeff Hammond, Warden Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Embry v. USA et al
as 6:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Alford Darrel Embry, Jr.
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brad Crow and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Crowe et al
as 5:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Oliver C. Crowe, Jr., Rebecca Townsend Crowe, Unknown Spouse Of Oliver C. Crowe, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Crowe v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
James E. Crowe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Teague et al v. Commonwealth of KY et al
as 3:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague and Tim Crow
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Armstrong, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. GE Disability Benefits Center et al
as 3:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Norman Crowe
Defendant:
GE Disability Benefits Center, GE Disability Benefits Center, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
