Cases 31 - 40 of 782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Silvester et al v. Falk et al
as 3:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Mark Silvester and Kendra Silvester
Defendant:
Steven Falk, Marcia Falk and Eversource doing business as Connecticut Light & Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Caplan
as 3:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Henderson
Defendant:
Jean Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milner v. Bristol Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
Bristol Police Department, Lance Podlesney, Dustin DeMonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvin v. Cheney et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mark Harvin
Defendant:
Jason Cheney, Schortman, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Simms et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Daniels
Defendant:
Simms, Renell, Mark and others
Feiner v. Goclowski et al
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Matthew Feiner
Defendant:
Eric Goclowski, Gregg Curran, Derrick Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Nestle Waters North America Inc
as 3:2023mc00009
Respondent:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
Petitioner:
Nestle Waters North America Inc.
Intervenor:
Mark J. Patane, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
