Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nguyen v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cuong Ba Mark Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Marks v. Hyun
as 1:2021cv00025
Petitioner:
Donald B. Marks
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Respondent:
Edmund Fred Hyun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seina v. Oahu Community Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv00554
Defendant:
Oahu Community Correctional Center, Hawaii Public Safety, State of Hawaii and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Seina
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves et al v. Nago et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Plaintiff:
Mr. Randall Jay Reeves, Mr. Ravinder Singh Nagi, Mr. Vicente Topasna Borja and others
Defendant:
Federal Voting Assistance Program, Mark Esper, David Beirne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Witsell v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2020cv00380
Plaintiff:
Mark A Witsell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeanniton vs. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2020cv00369
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and Mark Fiesta
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jeanniton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Kawamura Law Office, LLLC et al
as 1:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Robert D. Kawamura, Kawamura Law Office, LLLC, Doe Associations 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lauro v. Miyahira et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lauro, Thomas Russo and Thomas Reyes
Defendant:
Katherine Kealoha, Mark Miyahira, Honolulu Prosecutor's Office and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
