Cases 31 - 40 of 143
TUNSTALL-CAREY v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01308
Defendant:
ARAMARK, WARDEN DAVID KELSEY and ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDERS
Plaintiff:
OMAR TUNSTALL-CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BORETSKY v. CAREY et al
as 3:2020cv00652
Defendant:
JOSEPH E. KRAKORA and ANDREW C. CAREY
Plaintiff:
BORIS BORETSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDOWELL et al v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2020cv00433
Defendant:
CAMELIA M. VALDES, JOHN T. LENAHAN, JEFFREY H SUTHERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS MCDOWELL and THOMAS LEO MULLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KHAN et al v. PICCINI LLP et al
as 2:2020cv00200
Defendant:
JANE DOE, EVA K. CAREY, JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAMED KHAN and AZMA A KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEVERINO v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2019cv19164
Defendant:
ANDREW CAREY, WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, III, DETECTIVE BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
GRAY v. THEORET et al
as 3:2019cv15860
Defendant:
ANDREW C. CAREY, JUDSON HAMLIN, ROBERT THEORET and others
Plaintiff:
AARON ANTHONY GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAREY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv06815
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CAREY and THE ESTATE OF JEAN CAREY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. GTECH CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv15183
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JAMES A. CAREY, OSI LTT NJ HOLDING INC and others
Plaintiff:
ARLEEN L. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
