Cases 31 - 40 of 949
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moss
Defendant:
Clark County Title Co., Chase Bank NA, Housing Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Moss v. Clark County Title et al
as 3:2023cv05317
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moss
Defendant:
Clark County Title, Chase Bank NA, Gary Sautter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2023cv05278
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williamson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05263
Plaintiff:
Clark Williamson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rice v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant:
3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2023cv05218
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2023cv05216
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice et al v. Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05162
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
