Cases 31 - 40 of 285
Clark v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01534
Petitioner:
Michael Clark
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Clark
Defendant:
Tony G. Spurlock, White, Independent Health Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Beth Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. DISH Network L.L.C.
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
DISH Network L.L.C.
Petitioner:
Ritha Fullmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in - Personal Injury
Schendorf v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance P. Schendorf
Defendant:
Daniel Gomez, Tom Thwaits, JP Matzke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FoFana v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Linda J. FoFana
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Department of Transportation, The, Department of Housing, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Kidd-Aaron
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
India Kidd-Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Colorado Division of Securities, The, et al.
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
CDS, Colorado Division of Securities, The, United States Securities Exchange Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. USA
as 1:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Rodney Clark Price
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Esurance et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Defendant:
Esurance, AmGuard Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
