Cases 31 - 40 of 210
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby-Coleman v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Jamel C Irby-Coleman and Jamel C Irby-Coleman, Sr
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Joshua Wallen, John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
BRADLEY ROBERT COLEMAN
Respondent:
D. REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Vantuinen et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Eberaia D Fields
Defendant:
Alec S Vantuinen, Coleman Beckley and Kelly Wireman
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D. COLEMAN and ANTHONY COLEMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coleman v. Wexford of Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00958
Plaintiff:
Lennard Coleman
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, L Ivers, Carl Kunezli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BRANHAM et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. WAINMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COLEMAN
Defendant:
WAINMAN, YARD, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. KELLAMS
as 2:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. COLEMAN
Defendant:
S. KELLAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. TIERNEY et al
as 2:2021cv00376
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. COLEMAN
Defendant:
S. TIERNEY, C. WAINMAN and LAFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
