Cases 31 - 40 of 823
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Dr Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Roddy Sweet, Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Daniel et al
as 6:2024cv06013
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Leon Nelson, III
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Daniel, Dr. Nanette Vowell and Wellpath, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown'el v. Brock et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dion Brown'el
Defendant:
Daniel C Brock, Phillip E Miller and Clayton Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitts v. Klatt
as 3:2024cv03011
Petitioner:
Colby Blake Fitts
Respondent:
Sheriff Daniel Klatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Caple v. USA
as 4:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Glenn Caple
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mid-South Farming Company et al v. Ricetec Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Mid-South Farming Company, Daniel Farms Partnership, Lindan Farms LLC and others
Defendant:
Ricetec Inc, Adama LTD, Adama Agricultural Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
