Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL OF LOT 17 AND PART OF LOTS 18 AND 19, GOLD HILL TOWNSHIP, ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF NC HWY. 152 AND MARKET ST., A/K/A 419 CHINA GROVE HWY., ROCKWELL, ROWAN COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVE
as 1:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALL OF LOT 17 AND PART OF LOTS 18 AND 19, GOLD HILL TOWNSHIP, ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF NC HWY. 152 AND MARKET ST., A/K/A 419 CHINA GROVE HWY., ROCKWELL, ROWAN COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. YOUNG
as 1:2009mc00038
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY WALKER YOUNG, ACORN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ACORN II, L.P. and others
Audio-Video World of Wilmington, Inc. et al. v. MHI Hotels Two, Inc. et al.
as 7:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Audio-Video World of Wilmington, Inc. International Trade & Investment, LLC, Clara Grove
Defendant:
MHI Hotels Two, Inc. f/k/a MHI Recovery Management, Inc., MHI Hotels Services, LLC and MHI Hotels, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 4433 TANGLE RIDGE TRAIL, PLEASANT GROVE TOWNSHIP, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, PARCEL NUMBER 9808993840, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
4433 TANGLE RIDGE TRAIL, PLEASANT GROVE TOWNSHIP, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, PARCEL NUMBER 9808993840, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
