Cases 31 - 40 of 370
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07270
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gearbox Enterprises, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05593
Plaintiff:
Gearbox Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Wuhan Tknow Toys Co., Ltd., Shop1102268495 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Abdo v. OKC Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00725
Petitioner:
John Abdo, Jr
Respondent:
OKC Parole Office and Charles Mix County South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdo v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
John Abdo, Jr
Defendant:
Grady County Jail and Food Services and Tiger Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdo v. Oklahoma City Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
John Abdo, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Parole Office and J Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdo v. Melendez
as 5:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kathy Abdo
Defendant:
Omar Bibian Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv11798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
