Cases 31 - 40 of 112,687
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johansen v. Club Esprit, LLC
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johansen
Defendant:
Club Esprit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DURHAM v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
AKIEM DURHAM
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THURMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01028
Petitioner:
CORDNEY THURMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE DELSHAUN LENOIR and ARYN DESHAE MARIE
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT, PSYCH DOCTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cirrus ABS Corporation v. Strategic America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Cirrus ABS Corporation
Defendant:
Strategic America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mohamed v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Gavin Thomas Mohamed
Defendant:
Ronald C Heeg, LaPorte County, Steve Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
