Cases 31 - 40 of 743
Jose Luis Anaya v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Anaya
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Faustino-Anaya v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05157
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anaya v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01933
Plaintiff:
Raul E. Anaya
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Anaya v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Raul E. Anaya
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Faustino-Anaya v. State of Washington
as 4:2023cv05153
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
