Cases 31 - 40 of 1,100
Diggs v. Buskirk
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Dr. Van Buskirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01565
Petitioner:
Anthony James Eason
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffman v. Tatum et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Garrett Hoffman
Defendant:
Mark Tatum, Ted Tidmore, Justin Rufo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Enterprise Leasing
as 1:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Wells
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bazemore v. USA
as 2:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerome Bazemore
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Roderick v. USA
as 3:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Donald Anthony Roderick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Estes v. Greenrock Correctional Center et al
as 7:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Defendant:
Greenrock Correctional Center, Chadwick Dotson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Miyares et al
as 2:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
William Robert Gibson
Defendant:
Jason Miyares, Michael Anthony Robusto, Lisa Dale-Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Edwards v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
