Cases 31 - 40 of 623
Gallegos v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Gallegos
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Hazelton Warden and DSCC Grand Prairie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Bias et al
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Bias and Kevin Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. USA
as 3:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Roger Anthony Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Roger Anthony Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
West v. Lovett
as 5:2022cv00268
Petitioner:
Anthony J. West
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
West v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Petitioner:
Anthony J. West
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Hazelton F.C.I. Warden and Hazelton F.C.I. Psychology Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Unit Manager Moore, Active Superintendent, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anthony Baxter
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Superintendent Aldridge, Unit Manager Moore, Sgt. Petticrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
