Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv02467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rundquist v. Mayfield et al (MAG+)
as 3:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Eric P. Rundquist
Defendant:
Margaret Mayfield , The District Attorney's Office, 37th Judicial Circuit of Alabama , Nick Abbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Bethel-Muhammad et al
as 2:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda Bethel-Muhammad, Lajenna Hatcher, Dallas County Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mykins v. Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) et al
as 1:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Rosa Mykins
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) , Thomas James Craig , Jena Jo Michael Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas et al v. Buckner et al
as 2:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kayla Thomas , Haley Ponder , LaShannon Trammell and others
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner , The Alabama Department of Human Resources , Kim Mashego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Whatley v. Chapman et al
as 2:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Apriyl Whatley
Defendant:
Larry Chapman , Chapman & White Family Wellness Inc and Alabama Department of Human Resources, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. State of Alabama Department of Human Resources
as 2:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rawls
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
