Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Charron et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Charron , Denise Charron and Mark Laurange
Defendant:
David W. Harrison, Jr. , John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Orilus et al
as 1:2012cv04966
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Waters
Defendant:
Orilus, Olivo and Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Dale Alford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Waters v. Orilus et al
as 1:2012cv03047
Defendant:
Officer Alford, Officer Olivo and Officer Orilus
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Lempke
as 9:2011cv01316
Petitioner:
Gary Alford
Respondent:
John Lempke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv07043
Plaintiff:
Janina Jones and Louis Candelario
Defendant:
The City of New York , Oghenevigh Okrokoto, Jerry Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alford et al v. Administration for Children's Services et al
as 1:2011cv01583
Defendant:
Administration for Children's Services, City of New York, Librada Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alford, J.A. and P.A., Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. The City Of New York. et al
as 1:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alford
Tax Registration #942157:
Police Officer Caleef Mclean
Shield #3785:
Police Officer Daniel Gong
Defendant:
Police Officers John Doe 1-8 and The City Of New York.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alford et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv07058
Plaintiff:
William Alford and Diane Alford
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
