Cases 31 - 40 of 245
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04561
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Naranjo et al v. Verizon New York, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00066
Defendant:
New Libert y Plaza LP (Owner), Ann Taylor Stores Corporation, 140 West Street (Verizon Building) and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca Naranjo and Angel Naranjo
Undetermined:
Office of New York State Attorney General Eric. T. Schneiderman, Board of Managers of Hudson View East Condominium and Hudson View East Condominium
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ditech Financial LLC v. Silva et al
as 2:2018cv07395
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Victor Silva and American Express Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mohammad et al v. AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
as 1:2018cv23328
Plaintiff:
Feryal Mohammad and Wajdan Mohammad
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00163
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Whitlock v. American Express Bank
as 1:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
Christopher Whitlock
Defendant:
American Express Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-12753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
American Express Bank, FSB v. Paritosh Mazumder et al
as 8:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
American Express Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Does, Paritosh Mazumder and NPR Biomedical, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
