Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Anderson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02930
Plaintiff:
Armando Q. Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., City of Memphis, J. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Assorted Apple iPhones et al
as 2:2014cv02754
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Assorted Apple iPhones
Claimant:
Hamza Jilani
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC v. Solem et al
as 2:2014cv02627
Plaintiff:
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Solem , Joshua N. Anderson , Mr. Apple, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samsung et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01610
Plaintiff:
Michael Samsung and Son Truong
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Shelly Sterling, Jimmy Lovine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samsung et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00737
Plaintiff:
Michael Samsung and Son Truong
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Shelly Sterling, Jimmy Lovine and others
Sevier v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2013cv00607
Defendant:
Mike O'Reilly, Hewlett Packard, Apple Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Interested Party:
Judith G. Reisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2012cv02831
Plaintiff:
B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jole v. Apple et al
as 3:2011cv00882
Plaintiff:
Don Jole
Defendant:
Lori Apple and Jennifer Spriggs
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Apple View River Resorts III, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Apple View River Resorts III, LLC, Christopher J Gettelfinger, Herman E Gettelfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purdue v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00687
Plaintiff:
David C. Purdue
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
