Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03218
Defendant:
(fnu) Echols, (fnu) Galloway, (fnu) Byers and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith (ID 50867) v. Aramark et al
as 5:2019cv03146
Defendant:
Aramark, (fnu) Garcia, Air-Mark and others
Plaintiff:
Roger O. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2019cv03075
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Office, Correct Care Solutions and Aramark
Plaintiff:
James Scott Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Cline et al
as 5:2019cv03003
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Sherri Price, Tyler Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson (ID 44578 ) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Patricia Berry, Julie Dockendorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2016cv03027
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services , Julie Dockendorff , Patricia Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.