Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Gill v. Aramark et al
as 2:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Thomas Hare, Outagamie County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Aramark et al
as 2:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Aramark, Outagamie County Jail, Officer Finlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curlee v. Callahan et al
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Curlee
Defendant:
Rachell E Callahan, John Matz, Todd Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Prekop et al
as 2:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Anthony Prekop, Winnebago County Jail, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 1:2017cv01729
Plaintiff:
Tisdale DeMario Griffin
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Sheriff Dept , Milwaukee County Jail Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Aramark et al
as 2:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Aramark, Correctional Healthcare Companies Inc and Winnebago County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Correctional Health Care Companies et al
as 2:2017cv01365
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Lee Barfell
Defendant:
Correctional Health Care Companies, Winnebago County Jail, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2017cv01266
Plaintiff:
Michael L Gillum
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Armor Correctional Health Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Armark LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Armark LLC, Aramark Food Service, Supervisor Lenord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00927
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Winnebago County Jail and Correctional Healthcare Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
