Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2020cv06012
Defendant:
Mr. Heller, Stephen M. Ash, Dr. John Morley and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briglin v. Morley et al
as 6:2019cv06927
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Corrections Officer "John Doe #2", Dr. Cahill and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Briglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2019cv06906
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Naiomi M., Ms. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Sapona Plastics, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01234
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Sapona Plastics, LLC, Trim Brush Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Occhipinti v. Annucci et al
as 6:2019cv06651
Defendant:
G. Mohring, M.D. H. U. Sheikh, Osbourne McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Occhipinti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballinas et al v. 45 Mercer Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07766
Defendant:
LDV RG Lucy. LLC, Red One Plaza, LLC, Host RG 40, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Tejeda and Miguel Ballinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Ash v. Maglan Capital Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05650
Defendant:
Maglan Capital Holdings LLC, David D. Tawil, Joseph J Sitt and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac E. Ash
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Shah v. Ebix, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03229
Defendant:
Ash Sawhney, Darren Joseph, Robin Raina and others
Plaintiff:
Rupal J. Shah and Rupal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ash v. Thoms
as 1:2019cv02727
Petitioner:
Jamel Ash
Respondent:
Matthew Thoms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee et al v. The City of Troy et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Defendant:
Sergeant "John" Barker, Patrolman "John" Morris, Patrolman Kyle Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lee and Tymel Kornegay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
