Cases 31 - 40 of 224
Leslie Winchester v. Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2022cv05373
Plaintiff:
Leslie Winchester
Defendant:
Attorney General of California and UCLA Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leslie Winchester v. Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2022cv04555
Plaintiff:
Leslie Winchester
Defendant:
Attorney General of California and UCLA Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Lack v. Matthew Rodriguez
as 22-55583
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES LACK
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ, Acting Attorney General of California
Christopher Deering v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, et al
as 22-55458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DEERING
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 18, an employee organization, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public agency, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and others
Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 22-55336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IOWA PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture and TOMAS ARAGON, Dr, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, ANIMAL EQUALITY and others
Robert Espinoza v. Union of American Physicians and Dentists, AFSCME, et al
as 22-55331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ESPINOZA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS, AFSCME LOCAL 206, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as California State Controller and others
Andrew Stoia, et al v. Betty Yee, et al
as 21-16597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW STOIA and MARY DELONGFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY YEE, in her Official Capacity as State Controller of the State of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 2015, a Labor Organization
Bella N Harmony, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BELLA N HARMONY, INC., a California corporation, DBA Joyce Marie of Beverly Hills
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Calm Ventures LLC v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALM VENTURES LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Images Luxury Nail Lounge, Inc, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMAGES LUXURY NAIL LOUNGE, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge, SUMMIT FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge and NTDH HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
