Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Beasley v. Red Rock Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Gordon Beasley
Defendant:
Red Rock Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Beasley v. FV-I, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Damon D. Beasley
Defendant:
FV-I, Inc. and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Beasley v. Red Rock Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Janet Beasley
Defendant:
Red Rock Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beasley v. Brown et al
as 3:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Beasley
Defendant:
Arron Brown, Renee Brothers, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Banner Life Insurance Company v. Bonney et al
as 2:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Banner Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
John W. Bonney , Fletcher Pearl Acree, Michael E. Barchi, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morse v. Beasley et al
as 1:2010cv00967
Plaintiff:
Demond Morse
Defendant:
DeAndra Beasley, McIntyre and R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Edward Beasley
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Phipps et al
as 7:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Greene
Defendant:
James Phipps, Bradley Finch, Joshai Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beasley v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 3:2008cv00786
Plaintiff:
Raiford F. Beasley
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
