Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Plantation Realty & Mgt. v. Blair
as 1:2019cv03564
Defendant:
Akome Blair
Plaintiff:
Plantation Realty & Mgt.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gibson-Carter v. Rape Crisis Center et al
as 4:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Katie Joyner-Barber, Mark Revenew, Lynne Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Kesha Gibson-Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DANIEL v. BLAIR et al
as 3:2019cv00034
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BLAIR, LUTENT HURST, Officer Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
FRED LEE DANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron v. Multiple Numerous Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia inside Cherokee County Jail
as 1:2019cv01667
Defendant:
Blair, Curry, Turoczy and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. BLAIR et al
as 5:2019cv00099
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BLAIR, CERT OFFICER MOSLEY and LUTENT HURST
Plaintiff:
FRED LEE DANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Heap et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, Governor Brian Kemp, Attorney Michael Schiavone and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Muhammad Ali Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis et al v. Stubbins et al
as 1:2019cv00775
Defendant:
Pam Griggs, J. David Stubbins, Sandra Mason Blair Sasnett and others
Plaintiff:
Diego Legal Services Consulting, LLC and Jimmy Lee Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC v. Smith Blair, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05825
Defendant:
Smith Blair, Inc. and Xylem, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tao v. Blair
as 1:2018cv03543
Plaintiff:
Dr. Cheng Tao
Defendant:
Anthony Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Chatham Counter Narcotics Team et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judge Penny Hass Freesemann and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar M.A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
