Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Javelin Global Commodities (UK) Ltd. v. Booth
as 1:2020cv07550
Defendant:
James H Booth
Plaintiff:
Javelin Global Commodities (UK) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth Family Trust v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07461
Defendant:
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Donna R. Grogan, Jane Barlow and others
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Booth Family Trust v. Mylan N.V. et al
as 1:2020cv02885
Defendant:
Richard Mark, Neil Dimick, JoEllen Lyons Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Johnson v. Giles et al
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant:
Tonchie, Giles, Booth and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eaton et al v. Aurora Cannabis Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kathy Eaton and Philip Eaton
Defendant:
Michael Singer, Terry Booth, Cam Battley and others
Marcus v. Archer et al
as 1:2019cv07099
Defendant:
Johnny D. Lancaster, James Madden, Johnny Patout and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Marcus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
United States of America v. $26,532.00 United States Currency
as 1:2019cv00987
Defendant:
$26,532.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ella Mae Booth and Diana Sion
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ashton et al v. Real Property 3221 Church Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11226 BLK:4869 LT, 79 et al
as 1:2019cv04022
Defendant:
Rossrock Fund II LP, Real Property 3221 Church Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11226 BLK:4869 LT, 79, Apex Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Ashton, Andre Audige and Claudette Boothe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
