Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
High Bridge Associates Incorporated v. Aker Advantage Incorporated et al
as 4:2015cv00278
Plaintiff:
High Bridge Associates Incorporated
Defendant:
Aker Advantage Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridges v. M&G Tanque Verde LLC et al
as 4:2014cv02188
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bridges
Defendant:
M&G Tanque Verde LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Racer v. Morris et al
as 2:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
Frank Racer
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Lane and Unknown Bridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verrell v. ROC AZ Villa Antiqua LLC et al
as 4:2014cv01730
Plaintiff:
Paul Verrell
Defendant:
ROC AZ Villa Antiqua LLC and Bridge Property Management LC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridges v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
Todd Alan Bridges
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Patrick Hanlon and Adam Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horizon Community Bank v. Land Bridge LLC et al
as 3:2011cv08017
Plaintiff:
Horizon Community Bank
Defendant:
Land Bridge LLC , Bobby I Shomer , Kristin L Shomer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnett v. Stonewater Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 2:2009cv02046
Plaintiff:
Roy John Arnett, Roy John Arnett and Roy John Arnett
Defendant:
Stonewater Mortgage Corporation, Stonewater Holding Corporation, Stonewater Technology, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00262
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
