Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Aaron Pellum v. Bernard McKie
as 13-7635
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON WAYNE PELLUM
Respondent - Appellee:
BERNARD MCKIE
Taylor v. McKie
as 5:2013cv02239
Petitioner:
Robert Troy Taylor
Respondent:
Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Ward et al
as 9:2013cv01651
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Robert E Ward, James E Sligh, John E Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Slocumb v. Wood et al
as 9:2013cv01671
Plaintiff:
Conrad L Slocumb
Defendant:
Doctor B Wood, Doctor Tomichaco, Ms Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Slocumb v. McKie
as 9:2013cv00734
Petitioner:
Conrad Lamont Slocumb
Respondent:
Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Jenkins et al
as 8:2012cv03419
Plaintiff:
Charles H Davis
Defendant:
Ladson Jenkins, Sgt Harris, Douglas Beckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Larry Phillips v. Warden McKie
as 12-7789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY LAMONT PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD MCKIE, official and individual capacity, ALLAN WALLS, MD official and individual capacity and OFFICER SMITH, official and individual capacity
Shannon v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Shannon
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, William Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Habeeb Malik v. James Sligh, Jr.
as 12-7576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HABEEB ABDUL MALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., JANNITA GASTON, BERNARD MCKIE and others
Pellum v. McKie
as 0:2012cv02468
Petitioner:
Aaron Wayne Pellum
Respondent:
Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
